Tuesday, July 31, 2012

That ..... Art Art ....??????




Sometimes I wonder Muhas long hours of work in the studio if my work is useful for others ... The answer is not my answer but of others. It's just to satisfy your ego * * I wonder you do this ..?

I also question the state of the art at the beginning of this century.

In the first thought is not me who decides, and the answer is, are the others, if useful or not.

In the second I get the feeling that art in its evolution, has lost almost all content for which art was created in the beginning, to speak of information or beauty in art for many today sounds * *.. archaism is almost Art is nothing yesterday, possibly only the name.

In this second thought where two strong trends in me first, the illusion impossible to return to the * baroque * and the second to take responsibility of the * contemporary * in me, sintindome sad or not, that possibly I am part, safe of * * cynicism that permeates the art today.

The conclusions of the 2008 have been fantastic, exp in London, Ireland, France and back in August to exhibit in England, and three exp-collective in France.

So, no, sorry, he did not get that motivates the analysis and writing to you is to reach self-criticism, remnants of that messianic thinking * * that made me think about changing the world.

Happy holidays

Shit ... Because street * is not * as established, the intention to check the good or bad ...... education of two individuals can possibly also be analyzed.

If you have time take part in this debate and invited to participate.

Thanks

Felix Anaut

www.anaut.eu



Shut up shit ..... because contrary to what may seem * silent * Shit ... it is a serious attempt, one more of many, to analyze what's behind of .. the content of ... word art it is clear from this * ART * adjectives that define their era: Romanesque, Gothic, Renaissance to Contemporary and also reach the lifting of * Isms * that defininen some styles. Remains in * ART * that is common to all eras and styles ......? * ART * Information is ...? * ART * beauty is ........... ? It is technical material is contained is imagination ...? Is all this or any of this but ... this .... and all this ....?... worth everything in the * ART * what not worth ...? Your opinion is important logical to attempt to contact and know that your opinion.http: / / uk.youtube.com / user / Anaut .... Shit click for street for many figurative art, after 1960, particularly in N. York school has been defined as archaism, those artists who dared to pretend to exhibit at one of those very sophisticated galleries was if I had luck with a * not * in response and in many cases no response. We comenzdo our analysis on this point. Perhaps you could possibly say or have the power to spread this note for others to say ... your own / a Creame Anaut Thanks Felix does not divide art .......... there is only one human race .. land and a country ... the rest is demagoguery.

www.anaut.eu





...

No comments:

Post a Comment